Comments on: CALL TO ACTION: FLORIDA’S JUDICIARY UNDER ATTACK https://halifaxlaw.com/call-to-action-floridas-judiciary-under-attack/ Lawyer / Barrister / Solicitor Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:35:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Derek Brett https://halifaxlaw.com/call-to-action-floridas-judiciary-under-attack/#comment-62 Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:35:28 +0000 https://halifaxlaw.com/?p=488#comment-62 In reply to Mr. Hat.

Although, as attorneys, we need to be careful not to overstep rather peculiar Bar rules that limit our ability to directly criticize judges, there is sufficient immunity pursuant to federal law to permit for an open, honest discussion regarding matters of political-judicial relevance. Of course, “yes,” thank god for net neutrality.

]]> By: Mr. Hat https://halifaxlaw.com/call-to-action-floridas-judiciary-under-attack/#comment-61 Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:21:31 +0000 https://halifaxlaw.com/?p=488#comment-61 If you want to kill something going for the wallet is usually a pretty good route, especially given the current predestinationist social climate which tends towards blaming the victim for their lack of money.

On the bright side at least one court’s sided with your continued ability to post stuff like this unimpeded without needing to pay protection fees to ISPs: http://slashdot.org/story/11/04/05/015202/Verizon-Net-Neutrality-Case-Rejected

]]> By: Lisa Berlow-Lehner https://halifaxlaw.com/call-to-action-floridas-judiciary-under-attack/#comment-60 Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:13:51 +0000 https://halifaxlaw.com/?p=488#comment-60 Good work.

]]> By: Derek Brett https://halifaxlaw.com/call-to-action-floridas-judiciary-under-attack/#comment-59 Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:42:28 +0000 https://halifaxlaw.com/?p=488#comment-59 One more note on the above: I did edit the note from the attorney to exclude various, mentioned organizations. Also, the italicized text was introduced by me to account for my non-attorney users.

]]>