<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Good Article on the Fundamentally Flawed Nature of &#8220;Constitutional Originalism&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://halifaxlaw.com/good-article-on-the-fundamentally-flawed-nature-of-constitutional-originalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://halifaxlaw.com/good-article-on-the-fundamentally-flawed-nature-of-constitutional-originalism/</link>
	<description>Lawyer / Barrister / Solicitor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Derek Brett		</title>
		<link>https://halifaxlaw.com/good-article-on-the-fundamentally-flawed-nature-of-constitutional-originalism/#comment-25</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Brett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://halifaxlaw.com/?p=289#comment-25</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I appreciate the positive words.  This blog was something long in the making, and certainly allows me (alongside others) to engage in a constructive dialogue about serious, topical issues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the positive words.  This blog was something long in the making, and certainly allows me (alongside others) to engage in a constructive dialogue about serious, topical issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
