I am perplexed, and have decided to post my thoughts about this confound: Recently, I discovered that a friend had been victimized online by another individual with defamatory comments — comments which directly places my friend into danger. Concerned, I wrote the website upon which the perpetrator posted and requested that they remove t
http://www.alternet.org/story/154539/the_bible_belt%27s_love_affair_with_%28gay_and_straight%29_porn_?page=entire Full credit to AlterNet and author Alex Henderson. Henderson’s article, titled “The Bible Belt’s Love Affair with Gay & Straight Porn,” documents the arguable reality involving individuals in sta
http://feaweb.org/_data/files/2012_Court_Rulings_Docs/Order_on_Motions_for_Summary_Judgment1.pdf The opinion is attached. It is an exceptionally well-written order. Please note, within minutes, the State filed its notice of appeal with the First District Court of Appeal (despite publicly stating, previously, that it would abide by the C
Well-crafted, succinct opinion as to how the DOMA is violative of the Equal Protection Clause. This District Court Judge was impressive with the legal scholarship backing his order. http://blogs.findlaw.com/courtside/2012/02/defense-of-marriage-act-ruled-unconstitutional.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_breakingdocs
Special acknowledgment to ConsortiumNews.com: http://consortiumnews.com/2012/02/24/madison-father-of-the-commerce-clause/. It is important — critical — to debunk the garbage coming from certain less-than-reputable constitutional and political sources regarding the scope and underpinnings of our Commerce Clause. By the
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.